🔗 Share this article

The Four Spent the Day Together centers on characters chasing after fresh starts, trying to break free from addictions or harmful partnerships, only to find hope curdling into aggression. The author often employs the phrase "clean slate", making it intentionally weary through its repetitions. Phrases such as "He was ready for a new beginning" and "They decided to make a fresh start" recur in the narrative. And yet, Kraus herself is embarking on her own fresh start, since this presents as a novel form of writing – observational, truly literary. But then it turns out to be filled with the familiar conflicts and aesthetics as earlier books.

From Chance Novelist to Renowned Book

Chris Kraus started out as an creative who transitioned to writing unintentionally with her 1997 groundbreaking book I Love Dick, which was composed of missives to a distant beloved, converting personal female narrative from self-debasement into defiance. She continued writing, but the three subsequent fascinating and rebarbative novels did not possess the power and directness that the epistolary style brought to the tone of I Love Dick. It didn't help was her position as a maverick maker who had turned into a extensive real estate holder, so there was much discussion on property transactions. It makes sense that she presently aims to explore different types of content, turning outward to external narratives, at a moment when she states that current political era turns intimate literature obsolete.

Multiple Generations, Collective Unavoidable Background

The Four Spent the Day Together is divided into three sections, encompassing several time periods – each trapped by their backgrounds. We encounter the tale of a couple named Emma and Jasper, versions of the author's parents, transitioning from the Bronx to rural Connecticut. Additionally the story of Kraus herself, in the persona of a figure named Catt Greene, reckoning with the delayed acclaim of I Love Dick, the emergence of Trump, and her addict husband a man named Paul. The third thread involves the narrative of a homicide of one lost young man by another in a locality largely deserted by liberal ideals only a short distance from the protagonist's home in rural Minnesota.

For this reader drawn to refined literature of the type the author herself typically rejects, I was seduced by the narrative style of the first section.

As someone who reads drawn to crafted language of the variety that the author often disregards, I was seduced by the storytelling approach of the opening segment. It possesses a new quality of attentiveness that accommodates minutiae, like the pail that the protagonist as a child frees from the ice at the opening of the book, aided by her cherished parent. "I discovered a frozen plaything!" she exclaims; "a great plaything", he answers, "the nuanced interpretations of terms tumbling in their mouths like sweet treats". She tells the tale of Emma with inquiry and familiarity. "Emma felt like she'd stepped into a dream – not hers, exactly."

Letdown and Fragmentation

I was fated to feel let down when I hoped this different style could continue through the novel. Kraus notes here that she dislikes the satisfaction readers like me have taken from I Love Dick; she's committed to fragmentation, to the unpolished style she echoes from her idol author Kathy Acker, and the blankness and repetitiveness of her previous novels reasserts itself in the middle section. The protagonist is trying to renovate 36 run-down apartments in the most troubled areas of Albuquerque while moving between Minnesota and LA, unsuccessful in assisting her husband control his drinking. She is overwhelmed as Paul cycles through low-resource employment as an substance abuse counselor in a world propelled by the rage and anxiety that drives a political win. There are several pages about Catt's social media ostracism on a platform, her professional designation altered from "writer" to "property owner" on the online encyclopedia. The author still appears to be overly concerned about this. In a moment she remarks that she's researching the homicide so that before departing the state, "she may grasp something about an America that her online critics would be unable to grasp, would not even perceive".

The Murder Narrative

Then we reach to the murder itself – and the eponymous day experienced by the murdered individual with the perpetrator and his friends. The author possesses excellent raw material, and knows hour by hour what transpired when the victim Brandon came to see Brittney after meeting her on an app where she offered adult photos. He sought a sexual encounter but seems affably to have spent the day in the company of her associates, loitering getting his car mended and paying for snacks and drugs, before being killed by gunfire by her romantic interest a man named Micah – a individual with mental health challenges who has often been institutionalized for fits of anger.

Preoccupation and Open Ends

Catt gets obsessed by the account, and I found myself captivated by the way that the author's conflicting impulses towards ethical reporting and audacious rule-breaking wrestle in this part. However, I would have preferred her to explore more thoroughly her own obsessions here. The most interesting character is the character Brittney, who gains dimension in part due to Catt's identification with her – a similarly gifted, tormented individual derailing in a struggling, neglected community. The author informs us that Catt speaks to Brittney in jail, but she fails to enact these dialogues. The complete segment feels strangely incomplete, to the degree that the author's storytelling ends almost mid-par